Talk:Euthydemus I

Biography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polybius

Where, exactly, does Polybius give any date for Euthydemus' accession? As far as I can tell, his only mentions of Euthydemus are 11.34 (or .39) which we link to, and 10.49 which is linked to there. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very good question. It is believed that Polybius mistakenly mentioned Diodotus I instead of Euthydemus I, when he wrote about how the former king came to power "when the kings of Syria and Media where fighting one another". That fight is apparently a reference to the rebellion of Molon against Antiochus III in 222-221 BCE. The discussion is found in Lerner's "The impact of Seleucid decline on the eastern Iranian plateau". Kindly, Sponsianus (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Torlonia Bust

Recently, User:ZenoTheIonian restored an image of the Torlonia bust to the infobox on the claim that it is "certified" and that coinage should be "secondary". In fact as the cited discussion in the article text shows, it is not certified; the identification with Euthydemos has been rejected by R.R.R. Smith, the world expert in Hellenistic portraiture. But even if it wasn't, why prefer a bust from Italy to a coin minted by the king himself? It makes no sense. Furius (talk) 12:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because, and don’t be furious about it, (sorry), it is widely attributed to Euthydemus and is a better representation of him. One should use coins in the absence of a bust or portrait. However, if you are the author of this page I leave it up to you. Cheers ZenoTheIonian (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

haha. I take the points. There are a lot of 'zombie identifications' that were made up in the 19th century on the basis of limited information and continue to lurch around in encyclopedias long after they've been rejected by experts and I do think it's bad for wikipedia to perpetuate those. Furius (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a bit more thought... Furius (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with this plate - it looks a lot like the obverse of one of Euthydemos' coins which depict Zeus... But if you've got a source for it, it's fine. I don't know why you keep adding the title 'shahanshah' or 'king of kings' to this article - the only title that we have evidence for (from the Kuliab inscription, the coins, and Polybius) is 'basileus' / 'king' Furius (talk) 11:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great wall of Derbent

How is the Great wall of Derbent, which is in caucasus, constructed by Bactrians? it was constructed by Sassanian Empire. Syed123Afzaal (talk) 18:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The link is wrong, but the fact isn't. The wall in question is located at Darbend/Derbent in Uzbekistan (here). Furius (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]